You may have heard the appalling news that in Rotherham, northern England, some 1,400 children have been raped and abused over a period of several years.
The independent report into the matter said that no one on the council could claim ignorance over what had been going on. Yet only one has resigned.
One said that the workers on the case were 'waiting for guidance'. I don't know what guidance you need if you find out children have been systematically raped.
The truth of the matter is this: with a couple of exceptions all the attackers were Pakistani Muslims, and with a couple of exceptions all the victims were ethnically British (white). I know this sort of discussion is difficult for some people but it has to come out for it to be properly investigated. Why did the Pakistanis want to destroy the lives of white children but not those of their own ethnicity? We have to know the answer to this.
And this was their defensive shield: the council, the social services, the police did not prosecute them, because they were Asian muslims.
And we need to ask this: what is it with the Labour Party (for they were all Labour, bien sur) and child rape? Not long ago we had the story of Harriet Harman, currently deputy leader of the Labour Party and Patricia Hewitt, a former front bencher, back in the days when they were at the National Council for Civil Liberties. They were using taxpayers' money to help the Paedophile Information Exchange on the grounds that being a paedophile was a valid lifestyle choice.
Now Labour permit it to go on, the rape of children for God's sake, on the grounds that to make a fuss might seem racist.
Can we have an explanation, please?